The Huffington Post recent ran this article on the American Faith Party.
"Its leaders and adherents deny their goal is theocracy and say they only want religious freedoms protected"
I have to disagree; they only want THEIR religious freedoms protected,
and they fail to see that the only way to protect ANY religious freedom
is to protect ALL religious freedoms. This would mean giving atheist,
agnostic and non-Christian candidates equal gravitas to that which has
been enjoyed by Christians for more than 200 years.
I don't mind a
"faith-based" party at all, in fact, I think it's a good thing. The two major parties certainly don't represent a majority of either side anymore -- the fringes on either side are too far apart and the moderates aren't different enough to see why one should choose a certain party over another. At least a
party that wears its faith on its sleeve will have a certain degree of
transparency.
However, what mechanism will be in place to make sure that separation of
church and state is maintained and abuses avoided? Churches want to
play in politics and influence their congregations and in order for that
to continue, their tax-exempt status MUST be revoked.
Ink Paper Words' Profile
- ~j~
- Pacific Northwest, United States
- In elementary school, I desperately wanted my mother to order books for me from those flyers Scholastic hands out to kids. She refused, citing the "perfectly good library down the street." I exacted revenge by becoming a card-carrying ALA accredited reference librarian. Ha! Take that!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment